https://profiles.google.com/petra.fleischmanova https://profiles.google.com/petanka.flajsmanka/ http://myspace.com/petra.fleischmanova http://profil.lide.cz/Fleischmanova/ profile / http://twitter.com/PetraFleischman http://cs.netlog.com/petrafleischmanova http://www.facebook.com/petra.fleischmanova http://picasaweb.google.cz/petra.fleischmanova http: //fleischmanovapetra.blogspot.com http://petrafleischmanova.blogspot.com
Corruption is a black market to property rights where there is no owner. It seems too complex and yet with it and with the very most we meet in person. wedding stamps Each official, but today various "activist organizations" are owners of stamps. These "stamps owners" who alone possesses anything and are not responsible for anything, they are actually "owners of power, truth and principles" wedding stamps in a similar constellation, as Kundera once described. Without their consent confront the garage, you open your company, factory owners must still and always ask for "stamps" to bring their products to produce and sell. To replace windows or teach children to swim and sing, need their stamps. Even the angels wedding stamps would not stand in this situation. It is true that the more stamps, the more bribes.
That has not changed since socialism, just CMEA been so resourceful in making "needs" stamps. In addition, if the "stamp" cheap. Bottle of something good, a few hundred crowns, to some "warmth" sometime in the afternoon. Times have changed. The company grew rich, the stamps will abound, prices rose bribes. Neb came capitalism. System working with money and exchange of money based. He discovered the phenomenon of "corruption" in 1989 virtually unknown. Bribe a bottle of cognac is theoretically also "corruption", but since the days of ancient Rome routine. When there is a great punishment, bribe must be very bold, so worth the risk. Anecdotally, after calling for strict sanctions mainly the "voice of the people", ie from the poorer strata that "bribing" mostly "liquid round stamp". They do not understand that stricter sanctions also means an increase in bribes. A itself is poorer in the game of "stamps" against the rich would be eliminated from the game. They will not have it. A million exchanges of politicians, nor angels putting on all the clerks corruption fundamentally change. This ensures only change the direction of Europe. It's about to go from creeping onset of soft eurocommunism to a free society. It will be very difficult, and perhaps without a crisis across Europe (and the US) impossible. Police attempts to criminalize everybody today, are just a faster way to hell. It can be expected "interesting times". It goes obviously wedding stamps wrong. "Owners" stamps raise their taxes. Tougher penalties for corruption rising amount of bribes. You already do not move in the average, as it once was. Some owners of stamps boasts MBA degrees (ie. Young-Dumb-Aggressive). Their principle is that "corruption is a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself."
A moment's reflection on the book by Pavel mark and Jan Prusa entitled "Corruption: Economics vs. myths ". The book discusses the problem of corruption, especially on the issue of corruption in the public sector. On a relatively small area of the book is about this issue dealt with fairly detailed wedding stamps manner, in a value-neutral spirit. After reading this book probably will not be part of readers already believe (mythological) notion that nothing should be reformed, because you just replace policy for indecent decent. This interesting wedding stamps book now closer. What is corruption?
In the second chapter of the book, the authors deal with what is actually corruption. They state that: "In the literature, there is no generally accepted wedding stamps definition of corruption, and even less with the definition of bribery devoted to public debate." According to them, most literature defines corruption as the abuse of public power for private benefit. From this definition it follows directly that bribes observed in private companies is not corruption in the traditional sense, and professional publications on corruption hardly dealt with them. [2] The authors stated that corruption is most often understood as an act of reciprocity, where one service is performed in exchange for another one, the shift may or may not involve money. Further distinguished in the public sector are two kinds of corruption. Firstly, in terms of bureaucratic corruption that involves government wedding stamps officials. This occurs, for example: "... when an official accepts a bribe, that by virtue of his office issued uplácejícímu necessary permission, or pushed to make uplácející won a contract from the public purse." Secondly, in terms of political corruption, which concerns top politicians and not merely deciding on public resources, but also includes legislative activity. So when policies will promote the adoption of laws that favor a particular interest group, while the interest group will contribute significantly to the budget of the party's policy, terms of political wedding stamps corruption wedding stamps or the so-called. Rentseeking wedding stamps (for example, common in the US or Scandinavia).
In terms of economics, according to the authors of bureaucratic corruption has several important features. I will mention three of these characters. The first feature is the use of power outside the law, that the abuse of frameworks
No comments:
Post a Comment