Dowans ... goes on | I mbadeo2000
Oyster UNTIL THEN (THINK TO NO END.) Com weblog NOTE: Views or Opinions expressed timbre in this blog do NOT in any way Represent Those of any organization, community, association, company, circle of friends, or trance Religious group to Which I am Associated timbre with.
Agreement between TANESCO and Richmond Development dated June 23, 2006 to incorporate the generators of electricity following the decrease of the energy that was rampant in the year 2006 was transferred to the company timbre Dowans Holdings SA on October 14, 2006 one month before would involve the TANESCO as required by Pursuant to section 15.12 of the agreement.
The passage of the Statute allows the agreement was that was worth $ 172.5 million timbre kuahulishwa go to another timbre company after the agreement the two sides again for writing.
Part of the clause of the agreement clearly states that FP maintains that "Neither party may ASSIGN this agreement or grant any security Interest, charge, lien, or encumbrance in this Agreement Other Other than mutual agreement timbre by the parties in writing between". In other words, the contract forbids both sides (TANESCO and RDC) to transfer any responsibility timbre or any matter relating to this contract go to a company or other body without a written agreement between the two sides.
So any action on the part of TANESCO or Richmond timbre transfer agreement or its duties to go to another container without prior written consent of his partners was a breach of the agreement. However, in a statement that the Working Group created by the Parliament of the United Republic of Tanzania to investigate Richmond was awarded under oath Richmond company transferred its contract with Dowans Holding SA on 23 December, 2006.
The sequence of events according to the report of Working Group to RDC transfer shows that the Corporation Electric Supply of Tanzania lilifichwa truth of what was going on because not aware that at all considering the difficulty of transferring the contract to Dowans company Richmond already had imeshauhamisha treaty.
According to the report read on what kilichodaiwa and former Prime Minister Mr. Edward Lowassa that is "for mbwembe" indicates that TANESCO had RDC write a letter on October 27, 2006 to alert indicates that RDC was failing to enforce the terms of the contract (Default Notice) iliyotaka response to a few limitations that TANESCO were found. The report says that according to TANESCO these limitations included a "failure of the company to transport at least the first plant of approximately 22 kW unit to Tanzania; failure of the company to report regularly on the implementation progress of the project; the presence of the company's U.S. legally; The company's ability to make good financial professional and the Treaty of emergency power in real time. "
The aim of the report was to want answers from the RDC why TANESCO isione that Richmond failed timbre job and so break the contract. The letter of caution missed. According to the report Mwakyembe organization TANESCO likaandika e other on 17 and 23 November 2006 "reminded (Richmond) timbre about his arguments earlier (the letter of Oct. 27, 2006) that the zikujibiwa and demanded an explanation about the information that the company had no relationship with Pratt & Whitney very iliyotegemewa timbre carry a large part of the responsibility for the project. "
However, all these three letters do not move it zikujibiwa zilizoibuliwa and answers given to TANESCO influence of truth and intellectual influences. And the day of November 23, 2006 CEO of TANESCO was described by the Minister on the problem that was foreseen in the ability timbre of Richmond. timbre On November 28, 2006 five days after the letter of the Director of TANESCO Minister of Energy, Mr.. Nazir Karamagi phoned former Chairman of the Board of TANESCO Ambassador Fulgence Kazaura inform that the company was planning to Richmond to transfer his contract to the company "other" and so he wanted to know if the contract allows for that possibility.
Report Mwakyembe says that "On the same November 28, 2006 guidance of TANESCO's advisor Chairman of the Board as follows: - (i) Agreement between the Richmond Development Company LLC and TANESCO does not allow for the devolution of responsibilities to the Convention for the company but to the agreement of the two sides of Agreement (Article 15.12). "On 4 December, 2006 (less than ten days since Karamagi adokeze interested in Richmond transfer agreement) TANESCO timbre had received a letter from Richmond which showed that the company wanted to" use its right under Article 15.12 of the Agreement to transfer timbre responsibility its all in the Convention go to Dowans Holdings, SA In addition, Richmond Development Company LLC stated that on that TANESCO itaridhia these proposals should be the official date of the transfer of all the benefits and responsibilities for D
Oyster UNTIL THEN (THINK TO NO END.) Com weblog NOTE: Views or Opinions expressed timbre in this blog do NOT in any way Represent Those of any organization, community, association, company, circle of friends, or trance Religious group to Which I am Associated timbre with.
Agreement between TANESCO and Richmond Development dated June 23, 2006 to incorporate the generators of electricity following the decrease of the energy that was rampant in the year 2006 was transferred to the company timbre Dowans Holdings SA on October 14, 2006 one month before would involve the TANESCO as required by Pursuant to section 15.12 of the agreement.
The passage of the Statute allows the agreement was that was worth $ 172.5 million timbre kuahulishwa go to another timbre company after the agreement the two sides again for writing.
Part of the clause of the agreement clearly states that FP maintains that "Neither party may ASSIGN this agreement or grant any security Interest, charge, lien, or encumbrance in this Agreement Other Other than mutual agreement timbre by the parties in writing between". In other words, the contract forbids both sides (TANESCO and RDC) to transfer any responsibility timbre or any matter relating to this contract go to a company or other body without a written agreement between the two sides.
So any action on the part of TANESCO or Richmond timbre transfer agreement or its duties to go to another container without prior written consent of his partners was a breach of the agreement. However, in a statement that the Working Group created by the Parliament of the United Republic of Tanzania to investigate Richmond was awarded under oath Richmond company transferred its contract with Dowans Holding SA on 23 December, 2006.
The sequence of events according to the report of Working Group to RDC transfer shows that the Corporation Electric Supply of Tanzania lilifichwa truth of what was going on because not aware that at all considering the difficulty of transferring the contract to Dowans company Richmond already had imeshauhamisha treaty.
According to the report read on what kilichodaiwa and former Prime Minister Mr. Edward Lowassa that is "for mbwembe" indicates that TANESCO had RDC write a letter on October 27, 2006 to alert indicates that RDC was failing to enforce the terms of the contract (Default Notice) iliyotaka response to a few limitations that TANESCO were found. The report says that according to TANESCO these limitations included a "failure of the company to transport at least the first plant of approximately 22 kW unit to Tanzania; failure of the company to report regularly on the implementation progress of the project; the presence of the company's U.S. legally; The company's ability to make good financial professional and the Treaty of emergency power in real time. "
The aim of the report was to want answers from the RDC why TANESCO isione that Richmond failed timbre job and so break the contract. The letter of caution missed. According to the report Mwakyembe organization TANESCO likaandika e other on 17 and 23 November 2006 "reminded (Richmond) timbre about his arguments earlier (the letter of Oct. 27, 2006) that the zikujibiwa and demanded an explanation about the information that the company had no relationship with Pratt & Whitney very iliyotegemewa timbre carry a large part of the responsibility for the project. "
However, all these three letters do not move it zikujibiwa zilizoibuliwa and answers given to TANESCO influence of truth and intellectual influences. And the day of November 23, 2006 CEO of TANESCO was described by the Minister on the problem that was foreseen in the ability timbre of Richmond. timbre On November 28, 2006 five days after the letter of the Director of TANESCO Minister of Energy, Mr.. Nazir Karamagi phoned former Chairman of the Board of TANESCO Ambassador Fulgence Kazaura inform that the company was planning to Richmond to transfer his contract to the company "other" and so he wanted to know if the contract allows for that possibility.
Report Mwakyembe says that "On the same November 28, 2006 guidance of TANESCO's advisor Chairman of the Board as follows: - (i) Agreement between the Richmond Development Company LLC and TANESCO does not allow for the devolution of responsibilities to the Convention for the company but to the agreement of the two sides of Agreement (Article 15.12). "On 4 December, 2006 (less than ten days since Karamagi adokeze interested in Richmond transfer agreement) TANESCO timbre had received a letter from Richmond which showed that the company wanted to" use its right under Article 15.12 of the Agreement to transfer timbre responsibility its all in the Convention go to Dowans Holdings, SA In addition, Richmond Development Company LLC stated that on that TANESCO itaridhia these proposals should be the official date of the transfer of all the benefits and responsibilities for D
No comments:
Post a Comment